June 9th, 2008 — Lawsuit
T-Mobile, threatened over AT&T’s new free wi-fi at Starbucks, sues Starbucks for unfair competition.
I agree that this is unfair competition and AT&T is basically trying to monopolize the mobile hotspot market.
I’ve never liked AT&T that much due to the fact that they charge so much. Well, I don’t really like any telecommunication company, I think most of them are dirty as bank robbers.
T-Mobile should win this case and get lots of money so they can spend it back on their horrible over-priced hotspot technology.
Am I taking sides here?
No, I hate both T-Mobile and AT&T, now I am on Sprint, at least Sprint is fast.
NEW YORK (Reuters) - T-Mobile USA is suing Starbucks, saying the coffee shop chain secretly colluded with AT&T to offer free WiFi Internet access in its cafes despite an exclusive agreement with T-Mobile.
In the lawsuit, filed late on Thursday in New York state court, T-Mobile alleges that AT&T and Starbucks Corp are not living up to an agreement the three companies reached over how Starbucks should transfer from its T-Mobile partnership to a new partnership with AT&T announced earlier this year.
via gadgetell - reuters
amp, bank robbers, cafes, coffee shop chain, free wi fi, free wifi internet access, Lawsuit, lots of money, mobile usa, new york state, partnership, reuters, sprint, starbucks, starbucks corp, t mobile, takeover, taking sides, telecommunication company, unfair competition, wifi internet
Related posts
May 11th, 2008 — web2.0
According to recent rumors, Apple’s iPhone, will offer a “premium” 3G service, supposedly a lot faster.
Will consumers jump on the bandwagon?
I’d say hell no as a previous users of AT&T’s “premium” service (when it was Cingular), the premium 3G service is still slower than Sprint’s CDMA network.
Heck, I did a lot of testing over at our dot com blog when 3G was out about a year ago.
What iPhone needs is WiMax, a proven technology that seems to take years to get in the hands of U.S. consumers including me.
iPhone + 3G Premium = Still really slow browsing, still really slow twitts, still really slow whatever.
What Apple should have done is partner with Sprint in the beginning and they would have a lot faster speeds by now and 5 to 10 times faster once Sprint rolls out their WiMax.
Clearwire + Sprint = bad
AT&T + Apple = bad
Sprint + Apple = good
Clearwire + AT&T = good (let the bad companies work together so we don’t have to face them…)
According to a discovery by Chronic Productions, published earlier this weekend, and relayed by MacRumors, Engadget Mobile, et al., prospective users of the next iteration of Apple’s most ambitious mobile device will be given the option to browse the Internet via 3G broadband or by way of the now-standard 2.5G/EDGE connection. All you’ll have to do is flip a software-based switch, similar to how iPhone users currently transfer between EDGE and Wi-Fi connectivity.
via mashable
amp, apple, bandwagon, broadband, cdma network, clearwire, com blog, connectivity, consumers, discovery, fi, heck, iphone, iteration, mobile device, premium service, prospective users, proven technology, sprint, web2.0, wimax
Related posts
May 7th, 2008 — Zedomax Network News, google, web2.0
In a recent article by BusinessWeek, the writer claims that real threat to Google could be mobile phones. Due to the smaller sized screens, Google possibly be facing a lot less advertising space.
This is true if everyone started Googling on their cellphones but I see that is unlikely within the next 5 to 10 years.
Although mobile devices have proven to be more efficient and pretty much everywhere in Asia, the U.S. still has a long way to go because the telecommunication companies don’t want to sell new technology. The biggest scandal in the U.S. is that Sprint, AT&T, and all the other cellular providers are still behind in speed compared to the rest of the world.
In Korea, they’ve had Wi-Max, broadband internet about the speed of Cable DSL here for last 2 years or so. In the U.S., Sprint expects to roll out Wi-Max maybe end of this year, and that’s still a “maybe”.
For U.S. telecommunication companies, they make far more money by selling consumers outdated 3G phones. Why sell new tech when you got $500 million inventory of outdated phones?
So, in final words, no. Google will never have to face any real threat from mobile phones. Instead, they will probably get bigger with viral spread of their new open-source Linux-based mobile operating system, the Android.
With capabilities similar or better than the iPhone, Google’s Anroid will be able to convince the world to use their phone. As for ads? Maybe they will give out free Google phones that have ads on them.
Thanks to Josh for tipping me on this article.
10 years, amp, android, broadband internet, businessweek, cellphones, cellular providers, google, google, iphone, mobile devices, mobile phones, new technology, operating system, recent article, rest of the world, scandal, sized screens, sprint, telecommunication companies, web2.0, wi max, Zedomax Network News
Related posts
